Monday, April 8, 2013

Talking Tea-Party Paranoid Blues( With Apologies to Bob Dylan)


I was driving in my Jag                         
When I thought I spied a crank            
He was holding a 'merican flag            
Because he just got out of the tank       
I pulled over to the curb                       
And asked him what he'd done             
he pulled out the constitution    
demanding his rightful gun              

"I don't mean to be prying"                       
I had to loudly proclaim                
Revving my loud engine when parting    
I asked him for his government name
He said his name was "T"
And he liked to drive trucks
Looking over my shoulder              
I yelled back to him, "Good-luck."

Cruising the southern canyon
I came upon an odd group
Dressed up in sheets like KK klansmen  
I thought they were a Hollywood troupe
"Do you need an extra?"        
I ask with baited breath        
"You can join our small Party
If you hate the President"

I thought about their offer
Only once and never twice
I said, 'thanks a lot for your proffer
But for y'all I have some advice
Lose the pointy white sheets
Get some three cornered hats
March around like patriots
And help out the plutocrats"

Back on the highway I spied
On the right side of the road
Was my congressman personified
Speaking some bull crap in overload
Slamming down on my brakes
Running to his left side
I demanded my fair take
He was very mortified

"Out of here you useless pain
I'm not your congressman
You people won't find a gravy train
In my American master plan"
Returning to my Jag
I knew I was not spoiled
I flipped off the congressman
And drove away paranoid

I went to my car dealer 
Wanting to trade in my Jag
I wanted to buy a blue Prius
I ain't gonna be no Braxton Bragg 
Talking to the salesman
I said without remorse,
"This Jag I have been driving
Is really a Trojan Horse "

'A Trojan Horse!" he cried out
'And what do you mean pray tell'
I said 'it looks good on the outside
But it is really a car from hell
It takes me to places
I really hate to go
It's like the New York Times
Or a radio talk show'

Sitting in my new blue Prius
I finally drove back home
In my chair unceremonious
I vowed never to go out and roam
Watching the TV news
With my third beer in hand
The newscaster informed me
My world was coming to an end

Social Security's done
Medicare was wiped out too
Obama is a Republican
Harry Reid wears bright red shoes
John Boehner smokes a bong
With Rand Paul plotting wars
While Cantor sings torch songs
saluting the Stars and Bars

Saturday, April 6, 2013

What Tea-baggers Want


When observing your surroundings, it is critical to pay attention to everything. Let’s suppose you do a good job making your observation noting every little detail. Now you’re ready to make your analysis, draw some conclusions, and say something smart about what you have observed. 
But let’s suppose you don’t fully understand your environment. You think you do but you really don’t. Consider this, you are living on a perfectly flat surface and you are a perfectly flat person. One day while observing your surroundings, you notice a circle suddenly appear nearby. The circle grows larger and larger then gradually the circle gets smaller and smaller and just as suddenly it disappears. You explain this phenomena by saying it is a fact of nature. It is what it is... unalterable. 
Recently Jim DeMint, former South Carolina Republican Senator and present leader of the Republican Heritage Foundation wrote, "Today, more people than ever before -- 69.5 million Americans, from college students to retirees to welfare beneficiaries -- depend on the federal government for housing, food, income, student aid, or other assistance once considered to be the responsibility of individuals, families, neighborhoods, churches, and other civil society institutions....The United States must reverse the direction of these trends or face economic and social collapse."
For DeMint the universe is divided up into good and evil, black and white, government and business. In DeMint's manichean world view capitalist business is good and government is bad. Over his entire public career DeMint repeats the tired message that the government must get out of the way of capitalist entrepreneurs because government regulations hold back economic progress and that, according to him, hurts everyone. 
What DeMint fails to fully comprehend is the free market he adores is nothing more than a two dimensional rump representation of a far more complex three dimensional economic phenomena.
DeMint parrots a false distinction between the government and business. It is generally agreed that the economy is the basis of all civil society, but DeMint fails to see that civil society includes government. Change the economy and you change the government. For example, reverting back to an agricultural economy would eliminate most industrial production wiping out the industrial working class, the middle class, factory owners, and the need for bankers, corporate lawyers, and stock markets. A government built on an agricultural economy would no longer need to manufacture consent but would rule by decree.
From DeMint’s flat-world point of view he therefore becomes blind to the fact that the American government and big business (the oligopolies) are fraternal twins. Every branch of the American economy, and every market within each branch is dominated to the tune of at least 40% by a few corporations. These oligopolies profit from on again-off again government regulation because that regulatory flexibility guarantees their profits. These oligopolies compete in advertising only, rarely competing over price. The remaining share of each market is fought over by many small and medium size businesses which must compete in the "free" market on price. Thus small business profit margins are slim because they do not benefit from the flexibility of government regulation. 
For DeMint’s free marketeers the wolf is always pacing back and forth before the front door. Government almost always bails out their oligopolistic brothers and, at the same time, disingenuously praises the virtues of free market competition where the small fry businessmen are forced to swim or sink. To put it another way, DeMint’s free marketeers (including Tea Party types) are drowning in the deep end of the swimming pool yelling for help while the government life guard is watching over the oligopolies sipping cocktails in the hot tub. 
Because flat-worlders, like Jim DeMint, have a two dimensional perception, that’s why they can’t see the appearing-disappearing circle is actually a sphere intersecting a plane in three dimensions. Moreover, DeMint’s two dimensional vision for the United States can never fully understand the problems facing small business in our nation. And if he can’t fully understand what he is seeing, then, at best, his proposed solutions might make sense on his flat-world planet but on our spherical planet his solutions can never be anything but muddled headed.  
Then there are political implications, ominous political implications spreading out from DeMint's flat world ideology. In a republic the government is supposed to mediate disputes between contending parties in civil society. Otherwise the more powerful in civil society will exploit and dominate the weak and powerless. Instead of strengthening our republican government's mediation power, DeMint from his flat-world view wants to strengthen those civil institutions which are selfish and authoritarian ultimately destroying the republic. This is what DeMint and the right-wing Tea-baggers want. 

Wednesday, March 27, 2013

Burying the Truth Along with the Dead


It has been ten years since the President George W. Bush and his Neo-Con colleagues lied to the American people dragging us into fighting yet another war in the middle-east. The so-called evidence that Bush et.al. ginned up, manipulated, manufactured, and sexed up and then sold to the American people in order to start the invasion of Iraq was breathtaking in its arrogance. But the lies Bush told had accomplices, he had fellow travelers. The corporate news reported without suspicion and in many cases with aggrandizement every Bush deceit. Recently Phil Donahue explained how Chris Matthews pushed him out of liberal MSNBC because Donahue saw through the Bush lies and Matthews was pro-Iraq war. 

But Bush's lies and the complicity of the corporate news in the selling of the Iraq War is no longer the issue. The issue is the continued lying about the aftermath of the Iraq War which still goes on today. Nowhere do you see acknowledge the devastating high birth defect rates in Fallujah and Basra being reported elsewhere. No one in the corporate media talks about the American military's use of depleted uranium weapons and neutron bombs throughout southern Iraq. 

Nowhere do you see the corporate news talk about the actual number of deaths the Iraqi people suffered. The corporate news either repeats Bush's lies that 35,000 Iraqi died or the corporate news throws out a whole slew of random numbers, anywhere from 50,000 deaths to 150,000 deaths, coming from compromised sources. 

On the other hand, the British scientific medical journal Lancet reported 700,000 dead in Iraq by 2006. Ronald Waldman, an epidemiologist at Columbia University who worked at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention for many years, called the survey method used by the Lancet from which it gathered it's data, "tried and true," and added that "this is the best estimate of mortality we have." Scientific American positively confirmed the Lancet methodology. On September 14, 2007, ORB (Opinion Research Business), an independent UK based polling agency, published an estimate of the total casualties of the Iraq war. The figure suggested by ORB stands at 1,220,580 deaths. This estimate, although conducted independently, and using a different polling methodology, is consistent with the Lancet findings if accounting for the additional 14 months covered by the ORB poll. The fact that the American corporate press continues to play down Iraqi deaths tells us that American government lies about Iraq roll on and on.

If you were to give an enema to George W Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Rice, and the leadership of the corporate news in America......give each one an enema.....you can bury each one in a matchbox!